Showing posts with label riverbed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label riverbed. Show all posts

Friday, July 22, 2011

Weakness in European Technology Spending?





It’s been a good week for technology in general but three stocks stand out as being the big losers. Fortinet $FTNT , Riverbed $RVBD and, F5 Networks $FFIV have all seen significant declines. Why?

These companies have been written about on EarningsView. For example, Blue Coat Earnings Write Up , F5 Networks Growth Looks Solid , Fortinet Delivers Strong Results

What all three have in common is that they all reported weaker spending in technology in Europe and were on evaluations that appeared ‘stretched’ to say the least. I’ve decided to go through the conference calls and see what each said about Europe.


Company
European Commentary
F5 Networks
‘We have taken a fairly conservative forecast in terms of Q4 for EMEA as well. So, we are not looking for much growth sequentially there at all’…    …‘much like last quarter we saw weakness in some of the more macro affected economies in EMEA. Germany wasn’t great, UK wasn’t great. But the rest of the country did pretty well, excuse me, rest of the theater did pretty well.’
Riverbed Technology
‘Sales in EMEA were weaker than expected.. ..we attribute the softness both to the environment and our own execution’…  …‘Looking at Europe specifically, the weakness was in a surprising place, which is our central region headquartered in Germany, and Germany is supposed to have one of the stronger European economies. So that's what tells me there was some execution problem there.’
Fortinet
‘In terms of geographic breakdown of the billings growth Americas was at 32%, EMEA 2% and APAC 41% compared to Q2 2010. While Americas and APAC had very strong quarters, softness in EMEA from a macro perspective as well as timing of some of our large transactions resulted in lower billings growth for this region in this quarter. However, pipelines remain strong and we do expect to resume good growth in EMEA during Q3 and the balance of the second half.’…  …’ I don’t think it's totally ourselves, but what I’ve heard from some others that EMEA was, there was a little bit of malaise in EMEA, but that’s not an excuse, we think we will do better’





All three companies are leaders within their respective niches in technology and signs of weakness should be taken seriously. F5 Networks is a leader in application delivery networking, Riverbed is the top firm in the WAN (Wide Area Network) Optimization market and Fortinet is a global leader in UTM (Unified Threat Management) which is security solution primarily offered to small and medium sized enterprises.


European Macro Economic Woes Weighing on Technology

There is no doubt that firms in Europe have somewhat slowed purchasing decisions in response to fears over the macro environment and in particular European peripheral Sovereign Debt. I suspect this is a late quarter event because surveys up to June were indicating conditions that were holding up quite well in Europe. For example, here is the Optimism Index from Duke/Fuqua School of Business CFO Survey for June


Business Optimism Duke CFO Survey




Moreover, with regards to Riverbed we could be seeing the results of competitive pressures from the restructuring at rival WAN Optimization firm Blue Coat Systems International $BCSI. It will be worth seeing the results of Blue Coat because that company’s restructuring has been a long time coming.


Sovereign Debt Issues or Evaluation

I suspect, assuming a successful resolution of the European debt issues (Italy is the key) that these companies could report some upside surprise in EMEA revenues in the second half. So does this sell off in the stocks create a buying opportunity?

I’m not so sure and this view is principally due to the current evaluations. All of them looked stretched and were priced to perfection. In these cases, the slightest disappointment will see the stock price take a substantial hit. Even given the disappointing statements on Europe, these companies beat estimates and guidance was hardly weak, but it still leaves them on high evaluations.


Co
Stock Price
Q EPS Est
Q EPS Act
Next Q Guidance vs. Analyst Est
Current PE
Forward PE
F5 Networks
$101.5
91c
97c
97-99c vs. 98c
30.1x
28.7x
Riverbed
$32.3
21c
21c
21-22c vs. 23c
44.9x
36.3x
Fortinet
$21.3
8c
9c
9-10c vs. 9c
76x
59.2x



Frankly, I think the disappointment over the European statements is sending a warning over how highly rated these companies are. They are all attractive but, for now, these evaluations look a bit rich for me.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Blue Coat Q3 Earnings Write Up






Blue Coat $BCSI gave disappointing results which contrast unfavourably with Riverbed $RVBD, but might there be value in the share price? Blue Coat was originally written up in an in-depth article on this blog. The linked article should serve as providing the background to this update following results. In summary Blue Coat is a 'turnaround' story but as still to demonstrate that the company is on track.

The orientation of this blog is towards Growth at Reasonable Price (GARP) investing and so BCSI does not, as yet, seem to be a stock worth buying. However, for investors who favour special situations or value type investing than Blue Coat offers a more compelling proposition. Hopefully, some of the information here will be of use.


Blue Coat Q3 Results

The results were disappointing
  • Q3 Revenues of $123.8m vs. $125.1m estimates
  • Adj EPS of 34c vs. 36c estimates
As was the outlook
  • Q4 Revenues of $121-128m vs. $129.8m estimates
  • Q4 EPS of 32-38c vs. 38c estimates

Clearly, these are disappointing numbers and the stock sold off aggressively afterwards. Aside from the miss, what is peculiar about the results is that the analysts focussed on the performance of the Americas and Europe but completely ignored the Asian region in their questions during the conference call. This is bemusing, because the Americas looked ok (close to usual sequential decline) and Europe did ok. Asia was rather disappointing. The management said that the results were in line with expectations bar the Americas being slightly weaker than expected.


Regional Breakdown for Blue Coat Revenues

Before looking at the results in detail, it is worth nothing some of the points to look for in the results
  1. Blue Coat is restructuring the European Sales operation having previously over relied upon Tier 2 distributors
  2. Secure Web Gateway (core business) is a low growth business now as Blue Coat already has strong market share
  3. Blue Coat's WAN optimization solution is generally seen as weaker than Riverbed's (who reported v strong growth) but has the facility to offer security as well. When customers want both than Blue Coat is advantaged
Turning to the regional revenue numbers (the numbers in red represent sequential declines)


Region
Q2 09
Q3 09
Q4 09
Q1 10
Q2 10
Q3 10
Q4 10
Q1 11
Q2 11
Q3 11
Americas
61,295
44,110
52,663
53,305
55,255
53,561
58,344
54,612
56,937
55,067
EMEA
37,586
43,905
39,731
41,735
44,952
50,531
47,924
42,207
40,889
43,755
APAC
20,143
21,581
21,228
20,931
20,229
23,024
26,325
25,661
23,221
24,060
Total
119,024
109,596
113,622
115,989
120,436
127,116
132,596
122,480
121,047
122,882

Source: Blue Coat


The Q3 Americas numbers look weak but actually there are in line with last years sequential decline (-3.3% vs. -3.1%)  and the European numbers recorded a sequential increase which might suggest that Blue Coat is over the worst of the company's troubles in Europe. However, Q3 is normally a very strong quarter in Europe for Blue Coat. As noted above APAC sales were rather disappointing and Q3 was only 4.5% above 2009. This is not particularly good given that this region is leading the global recovery.

Interpolating the historical numbers and making the following assumptions could give the following revenues for Q4
  • Americas follows 2009 sequential increase, giving $60m
  • Europe Q4 tracks same relative performance (against 2009) as Q3 did, giving $39.1m
  • APAC YoY tracks Q3, giving $27.5m
This totals as a-conservatively put together-revenue forecast of $126.6m for Q4. The analyst estimates are for $129.8m but Blue Coat are guiding towards $121-128m. Either, Blue Coat is trying to under promise/over deliver or there is a fundamental weakness here.


Blue Coats Strategy

Essentially, the new CEO is trying to restructure the European sales operation and reduce its dependence upon Tier 2 distribution. As a consequence, Blue Coat held back from major lead generation attempts. However, the company looks set to accelerate customer acquisition activity following the hiring of a new CMO and expansion of a number of sales partner alliances with the likes of HP, Microsoft, Oracle and IBM. Whilst this process can be expected to take time -management are asking for 6-9 months- Blue Coat is selling into very favourable end markets.

The core web gateway security market may be slowing but WAN optimisation sales for competitors such as Cisco and Riverbed are soaring. It may well be that Blue Coat's WAN offering is not as competitive as it once was. For example Riverbed are claiming 43% share of the Advanced Platform WAN Optimisation market and are releasing new products (Virtual Steelhead and Cloud Steelhead) which enable the transition towards cloud computing. Similarly, Riverbed has just released 'Whitewater' which is a cloud storage accelerator that enables cost effective moving of storage to the cloud.

In conclusion, whilst Blue Coat is generating large sums of cash -see previous research- recent revenue growth has been weak and, the company is challenged to generate growth in its core market of secure web gateway. Nevertheless, it has the elements of a turnaround story and is favoured by strong end markets. For the value investor this may prove compelling.

For a GARP investor, it may make more sense to wait for confirmation that the Blue Coat product offering is not being fundamentally challenged. In the opinion of this blog, anything less than $126.6m in the Q4 revenue numbers will be a disappointment.



Monday, January 17, 2011

Blue Coat Ready to Take on Riverbed in WAN Optimization?

Optimizing IT Performance






Blue Coat Systems International $BCSI is an interesting stock that is focused on some high growth areas in technology spending. The co is well positioned in  providing Wide Area Network Optimisation Controllers (WOCs) , Secure Web Gateway and Application Performance Monitoring. These are set to be high growth areas in future, thanks to the explosion in bandwidth usage and mission critical nature of the Internet and cloud computing.

In summary, Blue Coat is an interesting value type of play. I argue that Blue Coat is in the 'value' category of stock because Blue Coat have some restructuring issues following disappointing European sales in 2010. The company has increased margins over the years with cost cutting by moving workers to Bangalore, however, earnings growth in future will be guided by a resumption to top line growth. If Blue Coat achieve this, than I would argue that they present good value.


Wide Area Network Optimization the Key Growth Driver

The WAN  industry is growing strongly as bandwidth usage expands exponentially. In addition, WAN optimisation provides a relatively short return on investment and can generate growth even in slower economic times. Bandwidth isn't the only issue as the usage of business applications over the WAN isn't linear. In other words, WAN resources might be needed at unexpected times.

The leader in this space is Riverbed Technology and $RVBD appear to offer a superior solution to Blue Coat in terms of WAN optimization. However, Blue Coat's solutions offer an integrated approach which can incorporate security and performance measurement in 'one box'. If a customer wants an integrated approach, he will favour Blue Coat. For pure WAN optimisation, he is likely to turn to Riverbed. It is incontestable that Riverbed has outperformed Blue Coat this year, but if Blue Coat can turnaround execution difficulties the company should have enough of a differentiated offering in order to grow revenues.

The likes of Cisco, Citrix Systems and F5 Networks all play in this market but they tend to offer specific or expensive large enterprise or data center solutions.

As stated in their Q2 results announcement, WAN optimization-rather than Network Security-appears to be their growth focus

'growth in the traditional enterprise portion of the Secure Web Gateway market has slowed. At the same time, we have been too dependent on selling into the company’s substantial installed base and in fact, we are very effective at lining that installed base last year'
 Blue Coat already has a strong market share in Secure Web Gateway with large enterprises and growth is slowing.


Blue Coat European Troubles in 2010

Blue Coat gave a horrible trading statement in May at the final results. Blue Coat's year end is in April.The essence of the problem lies within European sales

 
Region
Q2 09
Q3 09
Q4 09
Q1 10
Q2 10
Q3 10
Q4 10
Q1 11
Q2 11
Americas
61,295
44,110
52,663
53,305
55,255
53,561
58,344
54,612
56,937
EMEA
37,586
43,905
39,731
41,753
44,952
50,531
47,924
42,207
40,889
APAC
20,143
21,581
21,228
20,931
20,229
23,024
26,325
25,661
23,221
Total
119,024
109,596
113,622
115,989
120,436
127,116
132,596
122,480
121,047

 source: Blue Coat

I've put the European sales numbers in red to highlight when growth turned negative on a quarter to quarter basis. Initially, the company blamed the macro economic environment, however after closer inspection it became clear that executive and operational changes needed to be made.

Whilst Riverbed, in Europe, had focused on direct contact with key accounts in Northern Europe, Blue Coat had taken a different approach. Blue Coat Europe is supposed to run their global model of a blend of one and two-tier distribution approaches. Unfortunately, they seemed to be over relying on the two tier model, which caused problems when the slowdown hit. Ultimately, the sales force was focused on selling into the installed base and when their sales quotas proved too high, the sales guys were disheartened.


Restructuring Blue Coat

Blue Coat didn't stand still in dealing with the problems. Brian NeSmith was moved from CEO to Chief Product Officer and industry veteran Mike Borman was brought in as CEO. He promptly inked a two deals. One with Alcatel-Lucent in order to sell Blue Coat's CacheFlow solution to Telco's, ISPs and mobile operators.Similarly, a deal was done with Brocade to co-develop a network health monitoring solution for telco Co's. Given Borman's three decade experience with IBM, speculation is bound to ensue over closer collaboration between the two Co's. Particularly, as IBM is rumoured to be on the acquisition trail.

In addition, the European sales operation has been restructured with Borman recently stating that sales there were stabilising. Blue Coat has new products coming in the new year and this should help drive growth. The focus is on the high growth WAN optimization market, whereby they have to compete with Riverbed.

Another area of growth is Asia, whereby Blue Coat is not strongly established. The management is keen to expand in the region and in particular in China, where there are only ten employees at present.


Exposure to Public Expenditure Cutbacks?

Blue Coat like most other significant IT firms (Riverbed etc) does have exposure here. It is something that I am concerned with, as Governments (particularly the UK) have been cutting back on their IT spending budgets. This area will give Blue Coat exposure to the business cycle, however I think they may fare well due to WAN optimization offering a cost saving solution. Similarly, the network security is hardly an area that is easy for Government to cutback on. Nonetheless, a reduction in growth in public IT spending will result in a knock on effect to the likes of Blue Coat and Riverbed.


Blue Coat Growing Margins

Margins have been growing, thanks to downsizing and shifting employees out to Bangalore. However, I suspect that future growth will come from growing top line revenues as this process appears to be largely complete.


%
2009
2010
H2 2011
Non-GAAP Gross Margin
75.7
76.7
79.8
Non-GAAP Operating Margin
12
17.4
21.1
FCF Margin
6.8
15.9
18.7

source: Blue Coat, Earnings View


To put these numbers into context, the current market cap of 1.35bn with an EV of 1.14bn. Analyst forecasts are for Revenues of 498m and 535m to April 2011 and 2012 respectively. EPS forecasts are for $1.53 and $1.62.

On a free cash flow basis the stock is good value, for example if they play out the H2 FCF Margin and hit 498m forecast (I consider this forecast conservative) they will generate a FCF/EV of over 8.1%  This is cheap for a company growing earnings at double digits.

The question is, will they start to see growth get back to double digits in line with other cloud computing plays?


Blue Coat a Stock to Buy?

Frankly, I'm not sure. Whilst Riverbed looks fairly valued (analysts are starting to make a lot of long term assumptions over their earnings) I think Blue Coat still offers good recovery potential. The WAN optimization market is clearly lowly saturated and looks set for strong growth. Moreover,the restructuring looks to have been carried out in earnest and they do have good momentum in Asia.

On the downside, if Blue Coat don't get back to generating growth, than Blue Coat will have to erode margins in future by rethinking the business. I would look for confirmation of a turnaround in Europe in the next results. Furthermore, the  core business of Secure Web Gateway has slowed and I suspect this is the major cash generator. They are trying to move into the mid-level security market, but this has proved problematic for Websense recently.

I will monitor results.