Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Restoration Hardware Has Momentum

t’s been a pretty good earnings season for the home furnishings industry, and Restoration Hardware $RH continued the good cheer by upgrading its Q1 guidance only a few weeks after reporting an impressive set of full year results.

The company has a number of positive drivers behind it. It marries a recovering housing market with the spending power of the high-end consumer and a collection of ongoing operational improvements along with new category launches. In summary, it is well worth a look for anyone wanting to get exposure to the sector.

Restoration Hardware upgrades

Before going into details, I want to outline the changes to guidance. Note that these changes were made on May 10, having been previously been issued on April 18.

  • Q1 Revenue guidance of  $295 million-300 million versus $280 million-285 million.

  • Q1 adjusted diluted EPS guidance of $0.02 to $0.04 versus $(0.02) to break-even.

  • Q1 Adjusted net income guidance of $900,000 to $1 million versus $(1) million to break-even.

  • The increase in Q1 guidance is expected to be incremental to the full year guidance, so start penciling in upgrades folks.

For the sake of clarity, the existing full year guidance is $1.42 billion -1.45 billion in revenue and $1.29-1.37 in adjusted EPS.

It’s an impressive hike and the company lost no time in announcing on the May 14 that it would launch a follow-on offering of 7.5 million shares to be sold by existing stockholders. The business appears to be firing on all cylinders, so what should investors look out for going forward?

Restoration Hardware’s growth drivers

I’ve previously discussed the stock in an article linked here which should give some good background reading. Regarding its growth drivers for 2013, I have a few bullet points

  •  Increasing the number of its full line galleries

  • Growth from new business launches such as RH Tableware and RH Objects of Curiosity

  • Opening of distribution centers in order to increase capacity and improve service

  •  Expanding its baby and child offerings

  •  Developing its contemporary art offerings

It’s worth noting that despite the 30% increase in net revenue in Q4, gross margins actually fell 200 bps to 36.5%. This is largely a consequence of the increase in lower margin furniture sales as part of overall revenue. Going forward, investors should look to initiatives like the new business and, in particular, the contemporary art offerings to increase margins as they contribute more as a share of revenue. No matter the revised Q1 guidance implies 35%-38% revenue growth.

With that said, the key to its growth will be the increasing number of full line galleries. I note that previously, the company argued that only 25% of its current assortment was being displayed in retail galleries, but it recently quoted a figure of 20% (and below 15% if baby and child categories were included).

The opportunity is to expand retail space (via full line galleries) and maximize the potential in its overall assortment. Indeed, it declared that the first three full line galleries in LA, Scottsdale and Houston were outperforming expectations, and with new galleries being opened this year, we can expect more of the same.

What the Industry is saying

It is certainly not alone in reporting good numbers, although I note that other companies have differing operational improvements planned in order to benefit from an improving housing market. For example Pier 1 Imports $PIR is following a strategy of expanding its e-commerce activities and in store point of sales systems in order to drive new channel growth. Meanwhile its Q4 same-store sales numbers came in at an impressive 7.5%. My longer term concern here would be that its e-commerce activities might cannibalize its in-store offerings and place extra pressure on it to innovate in order to achieve product differentiation.

Another good indicator for Restoration Hardware is Williams-Sonoma $WSM.  It has seen good growth in its pottery barn kids and teens categories, and in addition to expanding its e-commerce and direct to consumer sales channels (now 46% of total sales), it has an ongoing international expansion plan. However it also needs to keep a focus on achieving product differentiation because online specialists like Amazon are entering the space. Just like Pier 1, the company is targeting mid to high single digit revenue growth. Impressive stuff.

And finally, I think Bed Bath & Beyond $BBBY is worth a mention. I think it has been the business most challenged by online competition and is finding it difficult to hold onto margins. With that said, it too is shifting to offering multi-channel distribution amid launching new websites and integrating acquired business. Rather, like Restoration Hardware, it offers some upside from improvements in operational efficiency, but on the downside, it also has a lot more specific competitive activity (Amazon et al) potentially targeting its revenue base while its growth has been less than stellar in recent times.

The bottom line

In conclusion, I think momentum is with the sector and it is a favorable time to be invested in it. Analysts will likely raise full year estimates so the top end of existing company guidance at $1.37 looks beatable. At least I would hope so, because at the current price, it puts it on a forward evaluation of 37 times earnings.

It’s not the sort of stock or evaluation that I would chase, but we have all seen how some stocks can perform when momentum is behind them and they are raising guidance. Don’t be surprised to see this stock higher by the year end, but be prepared for some significant downside if it misses any numbers and the growth story loses its luster.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Why Tech Can Outperform the Market

t has been a somewhat perplexing reporting season for many companies in cyclical industries. I’ve detected a recurring trend with a number of technology and industrial companies. Simply put, Q4 of last year ended quite strongly, and encouraged a sense of optimism that many companies haven't lived up to in 2013. The result is that many warned and lowered guidance.

Is now the time to take advantage of lowered expectations and cheaper share prices? I want to look at three factors that might help you make your mind up.

IT Staffing Companies are reporting good growth

Following the earnings misses at tech bellwethers like IBM and Oracle(NASDAQ: ORCL) investors in staffing companies must have been fearing the worst over prospects for their tech operations in their upcoming results. However, the reality turned out much better than most could have predicted.

On Assignment (NYSE: ASGN) is a staffing company that generates the majority of its revenues from the IT sector. It reported a strong start to the year and guided towards the high end of its previous full year forecast. Its IT end markets were cited as being particularly strong- with the largest growth coming from healthcare, telecoms & media. Overall revenue was up 13.6% and the stock rose double digits in response. Moreover, the outlook for its tech sector was flat for Q2 vs. Q1; in other words it is not reporting any sequential slowdown, and strong demand will continue.

In addition, Robert Half International (NYSE: RHI) reported good results within technology. Overall its numbers were a bit disappointing, but this is largely due to weaker European results. In comparison the US numbers were in line with expectations, and it declared that this was the first quarter in years in which its tech operations had reported sequential improvement.  Investors will hope it can stabilize its European operations.

My view is that the strength that the staffing companies have seen in tech is a consequence of underlying structural strength. Whereas the weakness reported by the software companies is more of a tactical response to fears over sequestration.

 Business survey’s are indicating strength

If this is a tactical issue –which could be resolved pretty quickly- then business surveys should be showing underlying strength. I find the Duke University Fuqua CFO Business Outlook Survey to be a useful indicator of corporate spending plans.

I’ve broken out the key data that interests us:




It’s clear from the graph that capital and technology spending tends to lag the earnings growth outlook. This is also intuitively true because if revenues are rising then the spending needed to service it should grow too. Note also that employment plans appear to be improving this year.

It sounds good, but we still need to reconcile this sort of survey data with the reality that tech spending was weak in Q1. My view is that, again, this is due to some sensitivity over short term events rather than an underlying malaise.

We’ve seen this before

If this argument holds, then we should have seen elements of it previously. Political and economic uncertainties have been with us for a while, and they are not going away anytime soon. In a sense I think businesses have become hyper-sensitive to them. As I’ve articulated in an article here, corporations and individuals have cleaned up their balance sheets and debt situations. It’s now time for the government to do so. 

The current worries are over the effects of the sequester on the economy and they were around last year too. They hit their zenith in Q3 over ‘fiscal cliff’ worries. I would argue that this is why we saw such a relatively strong Q4 in technology. In other words, firms held off from spending in Q3, which then got released in the next quarter.

For example, IBM talked of US orders falling off a cliff in September and spooked the market, only to report a strong quarter in the next set of results. Guess what? IBM missed estimates this time around as sequester fears kicked in. Oracle also gave a disappointing set of numbers this quarter and blamed it on internal execution. Even smaller companies like F5 Networks (NASDAQ: FFIV), Fortinet, Citrix Systems,TIBCO Software and others have warned over profits.   

Fascinatingly, they have all said a similar thing with regards their pipelines. None have seen them reduce –as they might in a systematic slowdown- but rather that there was a failure to convert them into orders. The reasons for this differ with the individual companies. F5 and Fortinet saw notably weaker performance from telcos, Oracle blamed sales execution, IBM blamed a mix of things, while Citrix Systems said a new solution caused order delays.

Of these companies I think TIBCO may be facing competitive pressures, and F5 Networks' near-term prospects are somewhat made unclear, thanks to its product refresh taking place. These things can take a quarter or two to work themselves through, so anyone looking for a tech stock to play a 'bounce back' may want to be a bit cautious with it for now. In addition, Citrix reported a good quarter with its rival Netscaler product, so it may well be taking market share from F5.

I think that they all experienced some tactical reluctance amongst customers, with many of them adopting the same ‘wait and see’ approach that they did in Q3.

The bottom line

If this thesis is correct, then this is not the time to go underweight in technology, and investors should hold their nerve with some of the disappointing results we have seen in the quarter. If Q2 bounces back in the way that Q4 did, then the sector could outperform in the coming months.