This blog is devoted to helping investors make informed decisions. It will be regularly updated and provide opinions on earnings results. It is not intended to give investment advice and should not be taken as such. Consult your investment advisor.
If you share my opinion that the market is getting a little too much
in love with food stocks right now, then the recent results from McCormick $MKC
will have done little to allay any concerns. While they were perfectly
okay, they didn’t offer much upside potential to a stock already trading
at a lofty evaluation. On a more positive note, I think there are one
or two things in here that read across better for other parts of the
food industry.
McCormick reports mixed results
For a while now, I have been of the opinion that McCormick was a good
company, but the market was overestimating its performance. For
example, in a previous article
I pointed out that the underlying growth (i.e. excluding acquisitions)
in its consumer segment (which contributes nearly 80% of income) for the
previous two quarters was only 4%. In addition, growth in the
industrial segment has been noticeably slowing this year. Yet, the stock
has soared.
Fast forward to the latest set of results, and the good news is that
the consumer segment has seen stronger growth, thanks to a mix of brand
marketing support and an increased desire among consumers to dine at
home. Meanwhile, the industrial segment has suffered a decline.
The negative growth within industrial was due to a combination of
tough previous year’s comparisons as well some regionally specific
issues. Oddly enough, European performance was described as ‘robust’,
while the Americas saw steady sales to food manufacturers but
significant declines in food service sales. Meanwhile the Asia Pacific
region saw sales decline, mainly due to the problems that Yum! Brands $YUM is having in China.
Putting these things together, I think it is important to appreciate
that there is an element of a zero sum game here. If hard pressed
consumers are buying more spices because they want to eat at home, then
it is reasonable to expect them dining out less in the kind of quick
service restaurants that McCormick sells into. In other words you can’t
look at these issues in isolation.
Reading across from McCormick’s industrial sales
Any analysis of the U.S. quick service restaurant sector must begin by looking at McDonald’s $MCD, and I wasn’t particularly impressed by its recent results.
Its Chinese sales have been weakening for some time, and its anemic
looking U.S. growth was achieved partly due to revamping the Dollar menu
and making promotions. Meanwhile, McDonald’s is talking about the
Informal Eating Out (IEO) category being flat to negative for 2013.
As for Yum!, it has got back on track in the U.S., but that too is a
result of promotions and recovering from having dropped the ball
previously while focusing on China. The good news in all of this is that
fast food companies like Yum! and McDonald’s are recovering volumes by
taking action, and ultimately that will work out positively for
McCormick. Indeed, the company is forecasting a stronger second half
within industrial as these effects take place. Furthermore, Yum! is
surely set to recover from the chicken debacle in China.
As for demand from food manufacturers, McCormick suggested that it
was seeing them more inclined to invest for growth (rather than last
year’s cost cutting efforts), but that there were fewer major launches
planned than in previous years.
Companies like Campbell Soup $CPB
have been forced to innovate with flavorings in order to generate
category growth or hold market share against private label competition.
The essence of the problem (pun intended) is that consumers continue to
trade down and shop in discount and dollar stores.
This has caused significant disruption for many food companies'
traditional distribution channels. As a consequence, over the last few
years, Campbell and others have had to differentiate their offerings via
offering new flavorful products, while trying to cut costs
elsewhere.The shift in emphasis towards growth is a good thing.
In summary, the difficulties for the fast food companies look set to
continue. In addition, there is not let up in pressure for food
manufacturers.
Where next for McCormick?
The forecast of 2013 growth of 3-5% was reaffirmed with a stronger
second half forecast, thanks to the actions taken by its industrial
customers to drive volumes in food service. Meanwhile, the higher margin
consumer segment continues to do well and long-term trends (more
flavorful food plus demographic changes ) look favorable for growth.
The question boils down whether you really want to pay 20 times
current earnings for a stock set to grow earnings in single digits for
the next couple of years. Frankly, I’m not, but the market might not
agree with me. Food stocks are in certainly the fashion right now but,
for how much longer?
No comments:
Post a Comment