This blog is devoted to helping investors make informed decisions. It will be regularly updated and provide opinions on earnings results. It is not intended to give investment advice and should not be taken as such. Consult your investment advisor.
It is getting ever harder to find value in the defensive growth
sector. Sharply rising markets tend to take all stocks with them, and if
equities in the health care and consumer staples were trading at a
premium before the move upwards then they are arguably overvalued right
now. Of course this creates problems for those of us trying to stay
diversified. With this in mind I considered it good tactical and
strategic sense to go back into CVS Caremark(NYSE: CVS).
In summary, the stock does have some political risk, but I think it has
all the hallmarks of a stock that can do well this year.
Time to Buy CVS and Walgreen?
Analysts love to talk about a stock’s evaluation relative to its peer
group, but what if the whole sector is attractively priced? I also hold
its rival Walgreen(NYSE: WAG); after all nobody said that you can’t own both stocks. With that said, there are some key differences between the two.
The first point is that Walgreen sold off it Pharmacy Benefits
Manager (PBM) business a few years ago while CVS’ PBM operations
contributed 32% of operating profits for 2012.
Secondly, while Walgreen’s challenge is to win back customers lost in the Express Scripts(NASDAQ: ESRX)
debacle , CVS is aiming to retain the customers it gained. Indeed, CVS
is confidently predicting it will retain 60% of these customers. As for
Express Scripts, ultimately it doesn’t matter which route its
prescriptions take to market.
Thirdly, CVS’ deal with Aetna(NYSE: AET)
gives it good growth opportunities as it expands services to Aetna’s
PBM customers. Aetna was reported to have added 1 million customers this
season, and this means more potential business for CVS’s specialty
benefit management program. Furthermore Aetna has high single digit
revenue growth penciled in for the next few years, so there is more to
come here.
Lastly, CVS and WAG both have international expansion plans but are
pursuing them on vastly different scales. While WAG’s investment in Alliance Boots is
significant and is intended to create management synergies, it doesn’t
involve direct control from WAG. On the other hand, CVS has been far
more direct but piecemeal in its investment in Brazil. The acquisition
(44 stores) is small, and I can’t help thinking that this is almost a
pilot scheme before the management decides to dip more than its toe in.
If all goes well we can surely expect CVS to use some of its substantial
cash flow to make acquisitions here.
Why CVS is a Buy
What both companies do have in common are favorable demographics, an
ongoing trend towards generics usage, increases in own store brands
(which come with higher margin) and a focus on personalizing medicine
for the community.
The last statement may seem somewhat PR fluffy, but I think there is
something in it. Walgreen is actively promoting itself as a local
pharmacy capable of servicing urban communities with things like
flu-shots and ongoing treatments. This is an important aspect of
ensuring customer loyalty and generating recurring income. It also fits
into the trend for diseases like diabetes that require constant
treatment.
Another angle on this is that medications are becoming increasingly
targeted and therefore personalized at the same time as IT is creating
ever more opportunity to profile customers and manage inventory
accordingly. This is a big plus point for CVS and its specialty
offerings.
CVS Equity Evaluation
Focusing on CVS, its investment numbers continue to make perfect
sense to me. Analysts have CVS on 15% and 11% for the next two years,
and company guidance is for 10-15% operating income growth. Free cash
flow remains very strong, and gross margins are forecast to increase in
both segments.
For example, the forecast free cash flow for next year represents
around 6.9% of its enterprise value. That is cheap for a business with
such good long term prospects. There are always political risks as
health care is an area where the Government needs to engineer cost
savings, but on balance I think there is a significant margin of safety
in the stock to justify buying it. So I did.
No comments:
Post a Comment