This blog is devoted to helping investors make informed decisions. It will be regularly updated and provide opinions on earnings results. It is not intended to give investment advice and should not be taken as such. Consult your investment advisor.
By now, you've probably had your fill of FedEx’s $FDX
latest earnings reports. The company reduced guidance, which
immediately gave grounds for the bears to come out and point to
weakening growth. In reality, it was a mixed report that actually said
more about FedEx and its relation to patterns in the global economy.
Investors are often criticized for believing that "this time it's
different" but in this case I'm going to stick my neck out and say that,
with FedEx, it really is different this time.
FedEx Equity Research
What I’m talking about is that the global economy has changed in many
ways since 2008. U.S. consumers have de-leveraged while European growth
has been weak overall and varied across its regions. Allow me to
briefly remark that this is because Europe is at least making some
effort to deal with its debt burden while the U.S. seems to be content
on making piecemeal changes while the markets reward it with low
interest rates. Meanwhile, China continues to be an export-oriented
economy and has seen export growth slow as a response to weaker consumer
demand from other regions.
These issues matter a lot to FedEx. Indeed, it can be excused for
structuring its business to deal with the kinds of economic conditions
that were around in 2007, but could it have foreseen what was going to
happen in 2008 and after? Furthermore, consider the nature of its
business and the difficulties inherent in adjusting its fleet and
distribution network to the new economic realities. The result is a
business that has had to make ongoing adjustments over the last five
years. And it’s not done yet.
FedEx’s ongoing challenges
I’ve discussed FedEx previously and readers who want to see how FedEx and UPS $UPS are both ultimately correlated with global GDP growth can read the article linked here. In addition to see the start of the trend away from express services readers can click here.
For now, I want to summarize the key issues in bullet-point form:
Consumers continue to shift to cheaper and slower delivery options
and away from express. Express revenues were $100m lower than previously
forecast by FedEx
Domestic express services were fine with the problem being in international express
Ground revenues continue to benefit burgeoning e-commerce deliveries
and with the declines in express and low margins with freight, the
ground segment contributed 79.2% of operating income in the quarter vs.
57% last year
Freight operating margins remain low at 4.4% for the first nine months, versus 17% for ground
The issues with international express are a function of how
international trade’s correlation with global GDP has gone down for the
reasons discussed earlier. Moreover, FedEx has had issues with network
efficiency thanks to uneven trade flows throughout the world. Global
trade was cited on the conference call as being lower than in 2008. In
addition, a constrained Western consumer has slowed the growth of
China’s exports. However, the imbalance in traffic to and from China
remains in place. All of these factors lead to logistics problems in
terms of fleet management.
These issues are exacerbated somewhat at FedEx, which chose to expand
its express service only to walk into the global slowdown. Indeed, the
problems have got worse over recent quarters. The company's response is
to accelerate the plan to retire older planes and manage the network
more efficiently by adjusting routes accordingly. Matters could not have
been helped much by UPS’ January launch of a new express air service
aimed at high-value international heavyweight shipments.
FedEx Competing With UPS
In fact it’s useful to compare the two because gross margins have diverged in recent years.
The problems at FedEx don’t seem to be going away any time soon, but
the company is taking the right action for the long term. In addition,
ground services now represent a large part of profits and the company is
doing fine with long term growth assured from e-commerce growth. The
lowering of EPS guidance is never a welcome sign, though. Neither is the
threat of more impairment charges as the restructuring continues.
That said, I think value investors might prefer FedEx to UPS on the
basis of a lower evaluation and the potential for it to catch up with
its rival after restructuring and hopefully increasing margins.
No comments:
Post a Comment