This blog is devoted to helping investors make informed decisions. It will be regularly updated and provide opinions on earnings results. It is not intended to give investment advice and should not be taken as such. Consult your investment advisor.
FactSet Research Systems(NYSE: FDS)
gave earnings which were met with an immediate markdown. For some
reason the stock seems to usually invoke great drama after it gives
results, but the latest numbers and guidance were pretty much in line. I
like the company and think it has some attractive defensive properties
which make it a good stock to hold in a balanced portfolio.
FactSet Results
At the previous set of results FactSet had guided towards $208
million in revenues and Non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.15-117c. In the end
it recorded $207 million in revenues and $1.18c, both numbers were
pretty much in line. Moreover the guidance for Q1 2013 of $210-213
million and $1.10-1.12 in EPS was in line with analyst estimates. So why
the initial sell off?
Who knows? But what we do know is that these results were pretty
good. Prior to them I had mentioned that the key metrics to look out for
are the Annual Subscription Value (ASV) and the client count. The
former represents the forward looking yearly revenue for the firm,
although I would caution investors from reading too much into it.
Clients can give FactSet notice and get rid of parts of the service that
they don’t want anymore. In reality they are unlikely to do so in
meaningful amounts as long as the financial services industry is doing
okay.
A quick look at how these two key metrics have been trending.
The recovery since 2008 is clear but, interestingly, note that ASV
held up quite nicely even in the turmoil. I’ll come to the reasons why
in a moment.
First I want to look at the underlying trends in more detail.
Client growth improved in the last quarter even though the pace of
growth in ASV appears to be slowing. Superficially this looks worrying
and could be a sign that FactSet is now pushing for less lucrative
customers however lets recall that new customers don’t tend to be the
most profitable so when client numbers are accelerating, it’s natural to
see some slowing in ASV.
Moreover the StreetAccount acquisition should create some good cross selling opportunities as well as a boost to ASV.
FactSet’s Defensive Qualities
The company did okay in 2009 for two main reasons.
First, it has a range of product offerings which tend to offset each
other across market conditions. For example if equity departments are
being cut back then bonds, alternative asset classes or foreign exchange
might be doing better. It is a diversified offering which compares
favorably with a company like Bankrate(NYSE: RATE) or Morningstar(NASDAQ: MORN).
Bankrate offers a lot of specialist research and information to the
banking and insurance industries and its products are closer tied to
their prospects. Meanwhile, Morningstar is more of a play on mutual fund
research. It is trying to expand its equity coverage but financial
firms are notoriously particular when it comes to information.
The second reason is that FactSet’s offerings are not the most
sophisticated and are often seen as a ‘trading down’ option. The company
is unlikely to take this line of argument but I think many people would
agree with me. Its solutions are certainly not as expensive as a
Bloomberg terminal or a Reuters desktop from Thomson Reuters Corporation and as FactSet adds more information it can increasingly encroach on these companies share.
Others may disagree with me and forgive my cynicism, but I simply
don’t believe that owning a Bloomberg terminal or Reuters desktop makes
any equity investment professional any better. They look good though and
it’s a key status symbol and the financial services industry is not
short of people willing to waste other people’s money on status symbols.
My point is that financial firms may well wake up to the fact that
their staff are no less effective by using a cheaper FactSet solution.
Where Next For FactSet?
The results look pretty good and the StreetAccount acquisition makes
sense. I would hope to see an increase in ASV going forward as the
acceleration in new accounts over the last year or so should bring some
added revenue opportunities.
I also like the defensive qualities of the firm. It will suffer a lot
less if there is some kind of severe financial slowdown. The realist in
me tells me that the story of the last few years is that no expense
will be spared to save the financial services industry and I don’t think
that will change anytime soon. In other words, FactSet’s customers will
still be around in the future. However the risk of short term
disruption caused by the EuroZone cannot be discounted.
Furthermore, it's hard to argue that the stock is cheap right now and
I wouldn’t be in a hurry to pay 24x earnings for a company in this
environment. This is one for the monitor list
No comments:
Post a Comment