This blog is devoted to helping investors make informed decisions. It will be regularly updated and provide opinions on earnings results. It is not intended to give investment advice and should not be taken as such. Consult your investment advisor.
It’s the end of the month and time to reflect on another investing
quarter. I’m a great believer that anyone who writes (or shouts loudly)
about investment should always try and disclose how they are doing
themselves. For the record I am up 54% YTD. Don’t get too excited I’m
leveraged (so expect volatility) and hedge but for those who know or
care my Sharpe ratio is close to 1. For the purposes of most readers I
write articles discussing investment ideas on the long side of the
portfolio. I short indices not stocks. In this article I’m going to
discuss the last quarter and some of the stocks I wrote about in June in
order to try and identify some trends.
Article Write Ups
I have tabulated the articles below, they are graded in terms of the
optimism expressed at the time. What should be noted is that the S&P
has performed very well during this period. As a rough guide, FactSet and McCormick
are a kind of dividing line. They were looked at and rejected on the
grounds of valuation whilst those above were viewed favorably. Those
below were looked at less favorably.
I’ve held and exited positions in Acuity Brands and ConAgra and recently initiated a position in Adobe Systems(NASDAQ: ADBE).
Acuity hit its price target but I would advise investors to keep an eye
out for its forthcoming results. I would argue that ConAgra is the pick
of the high yield food stocks. Turning to Adobe Systems, it has been a
difficult summer for technology stocks. Many have underperformed as the
market starts pricing in a cyclical slowdown, but I am intrigued by its
long term prospects. The company is undergoing a structural shift in
how it sells its solutions, moving from a license sale to selling
subscription based software as a service (SaaS) solutions. This is
resulting in lower initial revenues but the idea is that the (hopefully)
increased lifetime value of a client plus new sign-ups will generate
more value in the long term. I buy the argument.
Verint Systems Inc(NASDAQ: VRNT)
has underperformed largely because it’s management were too optimistic
in the last quarter and the stock got hit when it had to downplay
expectations recently. I’ve recently initiated a position in its rival Nice Systems.
Verint is a sort of hidden play on big data. It’s really a workforce
optimization company but as companies increasingly need to make sense of
masses of unstructured information with big data analytics, they will
also be driven to better capture and analyze customer interactions. And
that’s where Verint comes in.
I also like Discover Financial and have written positively on it
recently. I’m afraid I failed to pick some up due to a familiar failing
of mine. I tried to time a buy on the dip. Lesson learned but then again
I’ve told myself that before!
Evaluation Still Matters
The two stocks that were rejected on evaluation grounds (FactSet and
McCormick) have both underperformed the market. I still like both stocks
but find their evaluations have a lot of optimism baked in. Funnily
enough, they both gave results recently and confirmed that underlying
growth remains good. FactSet saw some decent growth in client numbers
and McCormick seems to be on an underlying growth path of around 4%.
Another stock that deserves a ‘neutral’ view is CienaCorp(NASDAQ: CIEN).
The stock is exposed to the bits of telecommunications spending that
are holding up OK like wireless and 100G optical network spending.
However, the company also talked of an expected pickup in carrier
spending in the second half. Others have spoken of this but so far none
has reported it and, if anything, the commentary around telco spending
has got worse not better. I would approach the sector with caution
although some point these stocks will be great value
High Yield and Housing
Two areas of the market that have been working well are high yield
stocks and US housing related stocks. I’ve been looking at and buying
both themes hence the interest in ConAgra, Procter & Gamble(NYSE: PG) and Pier 1 Imports.
I believe PG’s performance demonstrates what the market is favoring at
the moment. It is not doing anything wonderful operationally, but it
seems that any relatively high yield stock is seeing support come in for
it as long as it doesn’t disappoint too badly. PG does have some upside
potential from lower commodity input costs, but I am a bit concerned by
its reliance on emerging market growth. I’m also concerned that while
the US luxury and specialty retail markets are doing well the mass
market remains tough. No matter, the market wants high yield right now
to compensate for very low treasury yields.
As for housing related stocks, I hold a few and like the near term
prospects at Pier 1 however longer term I think this business could see
some powerful competition from rival specialty retailers, big box
retailers encroaching on its market and online competition from the
likes of Amazon. That said, the sector has been very good recently and I
think there is more to come. It offers a way to hit what Home Depot described as a sweet spot in the economy. Stick with the housing trade. It’s working.
Avoid China, Avoid Facebook
I’m a China skeptic and think the authorities will find it harder to
stimulate the economy than most people think. This viewpoint goes a long
way to explain why I’ve been negative on things like Joy Global and Caterpillar in
the past. Frankly the more that China’s GDP forecasts get weaker the
more you will hear pundits (usually with no skin in the game) telling
you to buy the China plays because they are cheap. In my opinion there
are plenty of ways to buy in the market rather than betting on a
communist country to stimulate growth.
The last stock discussed was Facebook(NASDAQ: FB). I see absolutely no reason why this stock should trade at a premium to Google. In fact it deserves a discount. Google trades on an EV/Ebitda multiple of 13.8x while Facebook is on 35x. Why?
Google has a tried and tested management that has demonstrated it
knows how to generate revenue across many platforms and a hugely
powerful position in mobile search. Facebook is a business trying to
manage a transition to mobile at the risk of alienating the generation
of value (user generated content) in the company. The switch to mobile
won’t stop people googling around and looking at websites but it might
stop Facebook users generating content. Particularly if that content is
on a small screen and interrupted with Facebook ads.
Many thanks for sticking with this post and I hope there have been some ideas here which will be interesting for investors.
No comments:
Post a Comment